February 10, 2014
8:30-9:20 am
We started with the objective of working memory. The client
was given 6 words to read and recall after another task later. The words were
planning, working, thinking, writing, reading, and resting. I wonder how they
were chosen or if there was a reason they were chosen. He had a difficult time
remembering any of them on his own, and with cuing recalled the words planning,
reading, and writing. I wondered if he knew the meaning of some of the words,
which would affect his working memory because we remember information based on
meaning. He kept saying “planting” for “planning” and that affected the rest of
his memory because he also said “garden” and “tomato.” It might be a good idea
to ask what the words mean as he is reading them for the first time. I am not
sure what the purpose of the activity is though, and that would affect the way
we do it.
We continued with inferences and assumptions, word
retrieval, article practice, and pragmatics practice. During inferences and
assumptions, the client was presented with a picture card and told to look at
it for a minute. The card was taken away and the clinician asked questions that
were already prepared about that picture. There were also inference cards
(words and pictures) where the client would have to read a short paragraph and
infer things about where they were, what they were doing, and how they felt
while doing it. The questions were informal and conversational, and the client
appeared to have no problem doing such
Compound words and spontaneous recall prove to be more
difficult. After the client was asked to tell the clinician as many compound
words as he could remember, he struggled with the task, pausing initially and
saying words like “cedar,” “barbeque,” and “apple pie.” He was cued and given
the example “mailbox” and then came up with words like “snowball,” “snowman,”
“snow bear,” and “ice cream” before admitting that he was thinking of winter
words. It’s funny how the brain works and I wonder if he knows what a compound
word is or if he was counting syllables.
The article worksheet proved to be too difficult a task when
read orally. It wasn’t until the clinician gave the worksheet to the client
that he was able to successfully complete the task of identifying the article
and replacing it with the correct one if it is wrong. He seemed to do well with
identifying, and fairly well with replacing except on the tricky ones like “the
airport” and “a security line.”
Pragmatics proved as well to be a difficult task. The client
was given scenarios where he had to choose the best response out of four. “You
are meeting a friend for coffee and he is two minutes late. What do you do?” A.
Tell him to fix his watch, B. Tell him that he is late, C. Don’t worry about
it, and D. Greet him and ask how he is doing. Immediately he wanted to tell him
he was late. It took quite a bit of convincing from the clinician to convince
him otherwise if he was even convinced. Pragmatics seems to be an area to work
with.
No comments:
Post a Comment